ABSTRACT Objectives: Brachytherapy (BT) with iodine-125 seeds placement is a consolidated treatment for prostate cancer. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes in patients with prostate cancer who underwent low-dose-rate (LDR) -BT alone in a single Brazilian institution. Materials and Methods: Patients treated with iodine-125 BT were retrospectively assessed after at least 5 years of follow-up. Patients who received combination therapy (External beam radiation therapy-EBRT and BT) and salvage BT were not included. Results: 406 men were included in the study (65.5% low-risk, 30% intermediate-risk, and 4.5% high-risk patients). After a median follow-up of 87.5 months, 61 (15.0%) patients developed biochemical recurrence. The actuarial biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS) at 5 and 10 years were 90.6% and 82.2%, respectively. A PSA nadir ≥ 1 ng / mL was associated with a higher risk of biochemical failure (HR = 5.81; 95% CI: 3.39 to 9.94; p ≤ 0.001). The actuarial metastasis-free survival (MFS) at 5 and 10 years were 98.3% and 94%, respectively. The actuarial overall survival (OS) at 5 and 10 years were 96.2% and 85.1%, respectively. Acute and late grade 2 and 3 gastrointestinal toxicities were observed in 5.6%, 0.5%, 4.6% and 0.5% of cases, respectively. For genitourinary the observed acute and late grade 2 and 3 toxicities rates were 57.3%, 3.6%, 28% and 3.1%, respectively. No grade 4 and 5 were observed. Conclusions: BT was effective as a definitive treatment modality for prostate cancer, and its endpoints and toxicities were comparable to those of the main series in the literature.

Resumo Objetivo: Avaliar a irradiação incidental dos linfonodos da cadeia mamária interna (LCMIs) com campos tangenciais opostos por meio de radioterapia bidimensional (2D) convencional ou tridimensional (3D) e comparar as duas técnicas quanto aos resultados obtidos. Materiais e Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo retrospectivo com 80 pacientes com câncer de mama sem indicação de radioterapia dos LCMIs: 40 foram submetidos a radioterapia 2D com tomografia computadorizada para controle dosimétrico e 40 foram submetidos a radioterapia 3D. A dose total prescrita foi 50,0 Gy ou 50,4 Gy (2,0 ou 1,8 Gy/dia, respectivamente). Os planos de tratamento foram analisados e os LCMIs foram definidos conforme as recomendações do Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. No tocante aos LCMIs, foram analisadas a proporção do volume que recebeu 45 Gy, a proporção do volume que recebeu 25 Gy, a dose para 95% do volume, a dose para 50% do volume, a dose média, a dose mínima (Dmín) e a dose máxima (Dmáx). Resultados: Tratamentos do lado esquerdo predominaram na coorte 3D. Não houve diferenças entre as coortes 2D e 3D quanto ao estágio do tumor, ao tipo de cirurgia (mastectomia, cirurgia conservadora ou mastectomia com reconstrução imediata) ou à média do volume delineado dos LCMIs (6,8 vs. 5,9 mL; p = 0,411). À exceção da Dmín, todos os parâmetros dosimétricos apresentaram médias maiores na coorte 3D (p < 0,05). A mediana da Dmáx na coorte 3D foi 50,34 Gy. No entanto, a dose média nos LCMIs foi 7,93 Gy na coorte 2D e 20,64 Gy na coorte 3D. Conclusão: Nenhuma das duas técnicas emitiu doses suficientes aos LCMIs para que se alcançasse o controle subclínico da doença. No entanto, todos os parâmetros dosimétricos foram significativamente maiores com a técnica 3D.

Abstract Objective: To evaluate incidental irradiation of the internal mammary lymph nodes (IMLNs) through opposed tangential fields with conventional two-dimensional (2D) or three-dimensional (3D) radiotherapy techniques and to compare the results between the two techniques. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study of 80 breast cancer patients in whom radiotherapy of the IMLNs was not indicated: 40 underwent 2D radiotherapy with computed tomography for dosimetric control, and 40 underwent 3D radiotherapy. The total prescribed dose was 50.0 Gy or 50.4 Gy (2.0 or 1.8 Gy/day, respectively). We reviewed all plans and defined the IMLNs following the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recommendations. For the IMLNs, we analyzed the proportion of the volume that received 45 Gy, the proportion of the volume that received 25 Gy, the dose to 95% of the volume, the dose to 50% of the volume, the mean dose, the minimum dose (Dmin), and the maximum dose (Dmax). Results: Left-sided treatments predominated in the 3D cohort. There were no differences between the 2D and 3D cohorts regarding tumor stage, type of surgery (mastectomy, breast-conserving surgery, or mastectomy with immediate reconstruction), or mean delineated IMLN volume (6.8 vs. 5.9 mL; p = 0.411). Except for the Dmin, all dosimetric parameters presented higher mean values in the 3D cohort (p < 0.05). The median Dmax in the 3D cohort was 50.34 Gy. However, the mean dose to the IMLNs was 7.93 Gy in the 2D cohort, compared with 20.64 Gy in the 3D cohort. Conclusion: Neither technique delivered enough doses to the IMLNs to achieve subclinical disease control. However, all of the dosimetric parameters were significantly higher for the 3D technique.

OBJECTIVES: Despite the progress achieved in the fight against cancer over the past several years, assessing the needs, goals and preferences of patients with cancer is of the utmost importance for the delivery of health care. We sought to assess priorities regarding quantity versus quality of life among Brazilian patients, comparing them with individuals without cancer. METHODS: Using a questionnaire presenting four hypothetical cancer cases, we interviewed cancer patients, oncology health-care professionals and laypersons, most of whom had administrative functions in our hospital. RESULTS: A total of 214 individuals participated: 101 patients, 44 health-care professionals and 69 laypersons. The mean ages in the three groups were 56, 34 and 31 years old, respectively (p<0.001). The patients had gastrointestinal (25%), breast (22%), hematologic (10%), lung (8%) or other tumors (36%) and the tumor-node- metastasis (TNM) stage was I, II, III or IV in 22%, 13%, 34% and 31% of cases, respectively. Treatment priorities differed significantly among the three groups (p = 0.005), with survival time being a higher priority for patients than for the other two groups and with opposite trends regarding quality of life. In multivariate analysis, the age and sex distributions were not associated with the choice to maximize quality of life. In this limited sample of cancer patients, there were no associations between treatment priorities and disease stages. CONCLUSIONS: Both survival time and quality of life appeared to be important to cancer patients, oncology health-care professionals and laypersons, but survival time seemed to have higher priority for people diagnosed with cancer than for healthy people. Additionally, survival seemed to be more important than quality of life for all three groups assessed.

Introduction Brachytherapy is an option for treating low-risk prostate cancer (PC). Biochemical control of low-risk disease can reach 95%. The practice advocated is that a review of prostate biopsies should be mandatory before choosing the best treatment for patients with PC. Our objective was to evaluate the change in PC risk after review of a prostate biopsy by an experienced uropathologist at a reference hospital. Materials and Methods Between December 2003 and August 2012, 182 men were referred to our institution for brachytherapy to treat PC. Their slides were reviewed by the same uropathologist. Results and Discussion Classification risk disagreement occurred in 71 (39%) cases, including one in which no tumor was observed. The main cause of risk change was related to the Gleason score (GS), with 57 (81.4%) cases upgraded to GS 7 or 8. Tumor volume was also compared, although only the number of fragments was reported in most original reports. The concordance of the number of cores affected by tumor was 43.9%, and in 49% of the cases, the number was decreased by the uropathologist. Perineural invasion (PNI) was reported in one quarter of original reports, and the agreement was 58%. Conclusion Slide review by an uropathologist remains essential at reference radiotherapy centers for the treatment of PC. The change in PC risk evaluation is mainly due to the GS, but tumor volume and PNI, which are important for the characterization of tumor aggressiveness, are also misinterpreted and could drive a change in the therapy choice.

O câncer de mama é a neoplasia maligna mais frequente entre as mulheres. A escolha terapêutica depende do estádio clínico da doença, das características anatomopatológicas, idade, entre outros. O objetivo do presente estudo é apresentar uma atualização dos conceitos e definições da radioterapia (RT) no tratamento conservador do câncer de mama estádio inicial, enfatizando as indicações, contraindicações, dose e fracionamento da RT (esquema clássico, hipofracionado e irradiação parcial da mama), RT adjuvante no carcinoma ductal in situ (CDIS), irradiação das cadeias linfonodais e relação da RT com preditores moleculares de recorrência. Foram utilizadas as bases de dados MEDLINE, SciELO e Cochrane para a seleção dos principais artigos disponíveis sobre a temática proposta. A RT adjuvante tem um papel definido na abordagem das pacientes com câncer da mama submetidas à terapia cirúrgica conservadora. Em pacientes selecionadas, podem-se empregar esquemas de RT hipofracionada ou irradiação parcial das mamas. Todas as pacientes com CDIS devem receber RT adjuvante. Não se sabe a correlação do papel da RT com preditores moleculares de recorrência local e sistêmica.

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy among women. Therapeutic options are based on disease staging, histopathological characteristics, age, and others. The objective of the present study is to carry out an update of the concepts and definitions of radiotherapy (RT) in conservative treatment of early-stage breast cancer, with emphasis on indications, contraindications, RT dose fractionation schedules (classic, hypofractionated and partial breast irradiation), adjuvant RT in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and molecular predictors of recurrence. MEDLINE, SciELO and Cochrane databases were used for article selection. Adjuvant RT is indicated for patients with BC who underwent conservative breast surgery. In selected patients, hypofractionated or partial breast irradiation can be used. Adjuvant RT should be provided for all patients with DCIS. The correlation of RT and molecular predictors of local and systemic recurrence are not yet well-known.

Micose fungoide é um tipo de linfoma não Hodgkin de células T raro que acomete primariamente a pele. Caracteriza-se pela presença de placas eritematosas que evoluem para lesões ulceradas, tumores em toda a pele ou ainda infiltração de medula óssea em estágios avançados. Como opção de tratamento para os casos iniciais, tem-se quimioterapia e corticoterapia tópica, fototerapia e radioterapia. Este estudo relata o caso de um doente com múltiplas lesões tumorais na pele já biopsiadas com diagnóstico de micose fungoide. O paciente foi refratário ao tratamento com quimioterapia tópica e fototerapia, sendo então indicada irradiação total da pele com elétrons

Mycosis fungoides is a rare type of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of T cells that primarily affects the skin. It is characterized by the presence of erythematous plaques that evolve into ulcerated lesions, tumors throughout the skin or even bone marrow infiltration in advanced stages. Chemotherapy and topical steroids, phototherapy and radiotherapy are treatment options for early cases. This study reports the case of patient with multiple tumor lesions in the skin already biopsied with diagnosis of mycosis fungoides. The patient was refractory to both treatments with topical chemotherapy and phototherapy. It was then indicated total skin irradiation with electrons